Miami Motor Sales, Inc. v. Singleton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Miami Motor Sales, Inc. v. Singleton

107 N.E.2d 130, 62 Ohio Law. Abs. 244, 1951 Ohio App. LEXIS 963

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 9, 1951

DocketNo. 2135

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 107 N.E.2d 130 (Miami Motor Sales, Inc. v. Singleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miami Motor Sales, Inc. v. Singleton, 107 N.E.2d 130, 62 Ohio Law. Abs. 244, 1951 Ohio App. LEXIS 963 (Ohio Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

[245]*245OPINION

By THE COURT:

Submitted on motion of plaintiff-appellee to dismiss the appeal on the ground that defendant-appellant' failed to file his assignments of error and brief within the time prescribed by Rule VII.

This is an appeal on questions of law. The record shows that appellant failed to comply with the requirements of Rule VII.

This Court has consistently ruled that where the appellant fails to file assignments of error and brief within fifty days after the filing of notice of intention to appeal, the motion to dismiss the appeal will be sustained. See State ex rel. Merrill v. Moore, 83 Oh Ap 525, 82 N. E. (2d) 323, and cases cited therein.

Motion to dismiss sustained.

MILLER, PJ, HORNBECK and WISEMAN, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI