MIAMI JEWISH HOME AND HOSPITAL INC. v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 14, 2023
Docket23-0418
StatusPublished

This text of MIAMI JEWISH HOME AND HOSPITAL INC. v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY (MIAMI JEWISH HOME AND HOSPITAL INC. v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MIAMI JEWISH HOME AND HOSPITAL INC. v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, (Fla. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed June 14, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-418 Lower Tribunal No. 22-3 AP ________________

Miami Jewish Home and Hospital Inc., Petitioner,

vs.

Miami-Dade County, Respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Appellate Division, Daryl E. Trawick, Lisa S. Walsh and Maria de Jesus Santovenia, Judges.

Bercow Radell Fernandez Larkin & Tapanes, PLLC, and Thomas H. Robertson and Nicholas J. Rodriguez-Caballero, for petitioner.

Geraldine Bonzon-Keenan, Miami-Dade County Attorney, and Sarah E. Davis and Angela F. Benjamin, Assistant County Attorneys, for respondent.

Before EMAS, LOGUE and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Denied. See Custer Med. Ctr. v. United Auto. Inc. Co., 62 So. 3d 1086,

1092-93 (Fla. 2010) (noting that “the district courts should consider the

nature of the error and grant a petition for writ of certiorari ‘only when there

has been a violation of a clearly established principle of law resulting in a

miscarriage of justice;’” acknowledging that “this Court has definitively

expressed that certiorari cannot be used to grant a second appeal to correct

the existence of mere legal error;” and holding that “a circuit court appellate

decision made according to the forms of law and the rules prescribed for

rendering it, although it may be erroneous in its conclusion as to what the

law is as applied to the facts, is not a departure from the essential

requirements of the law remediable by certiorari”) (additional citations

omitted).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Custer Medical Center v. United Automobile Insurance Co.
62 So. 3d 1086 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MIAMI JEWISH HOME AND HOSPITAL INC. v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miami-jewish-home-and-hospital-inc-v-miami-dade-county-fladistctapp-2023.