Miami International Merchandise Mart, Inc. v. Gene Somers & Associates, Inc.

506 So. 2d 54, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1109, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7915
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 28, 1987
DocketNo. 86-287
StatusPublished

This text of 506 So. 2d 54 (Miami International Merchandise Mart, Inc. v. Gene Somers & Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miami International Merchandise Mart, Inc. v. Gene Somers & Associates, Inc., 506 So. 2d 54, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1109, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7915 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order dismissing the third party complaint for contractual indemnity filed by Miami International Merchandise Mart, Inc. (MIMM) against Gene Somers & Associates, Inc. (GS & A), the injured plaintiff’s employer. Section 440.11(1), Florida Statutes (1985) is unconstitutional to the extent that it operates to immunize an employer from liability to a third party where the employer contracted to indemnify the third party against liability for injuries to its employees. City of Clearwater v. L.M. Duncan & Sons, Inc., 466 So.2d 1116 (Fla.2d DCA 1985), aff'd, 478 So.2d 816 (Fla.1985); see Sunspan Eng’g & Constr. Co. v. Spring-Lock Scaffolding, 310 So.2d 4 (Fla.1975); Mortgage Corp. of America v. Vorndran, 334 So.2d 88 (Fla.3d DCA 1976). Since the [55]*55parties’ lease agreement provided that GS & A would indemnify MIMM for liability it might incur to GS & A’s employees, the third party complaint stated a cause of action for indemnity and should not have been dismissed. GS & A’s contention that the dismissal was properly granted because MIMM’s negligence was the sole cause of the employee’s injuries is unavailing because it presumes the existence of a fact not yet decided. See L.M. Duncan & Sons, Inc. v. City of Clearwater, 478 So.2d 816, 817-18 (Fla.1985). Accordingly, the order dismissing MIMM’s third party complaint is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Clearwater v. DUNCAN & SONS
466 So. 2d 1116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Sunspan Eng. & Const. Co. v. SPRING-LOCK SCAFFOLD. CO.
310 So. 2d 4 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
LM Duncan & Sons v. City of Clearwater
478 So. 2d 816 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Mortgage Corp. of America v. Vorndran
334 So. 2d 88 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
506 So. 2d 54, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1109, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miami-international-merchandise-mart-inc-v-gene-somers-associates-fladistctapp-1987.