Miami Exporting Co. v. Brown

Ohio Supreme Court

Miami Exporting Co. v. Brown

6 Ohio 535

DecidedDecember 15, 1834

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Ohio 535 (Miami Exporting Co. v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miami Exporting Co. v. Brown, 6 Ohio 535 (Ohio 1834).

Pincite

Opinion

Judge Lane

stated the case, and delivered the opinion of the court, deciding that the authority to take jurisdiction by the common pleas, was dependent upon a notice regularly issued and served in due time upon the defendants. Both these facts must appear in the record as the foundation of the jurisdiction. If they do not thus appear, the judgment is coram non judice. Such being the state of this case, judgment was given for the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judge Lane

stated the case, and delivered the opinion of the court, deciding that the authority to take jurisdiction by the common pleas, was dependent upon a notice regularly issued and served in due time upon the defendants. Both these facts must appear in the record as the foundation of the jurisdiction. If they do not thus appear, the judgment is coram non judice. Such being the state of this case, judgment was given for the defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Ohio 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miami-exporting-co-v-brown-ohio-1834.