Miami Elevator Co. v. Winewood Park Ltd. Partnership

750 So. 2d 151, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 896, 2000 WL 121405
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 2, 2000·No. No. 3D99-2347·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Miami Elevator Company appeals from a non-final order granting Winewood Park Limited Partnership’s, (Winewood) motion to transfer venue in this breach of contract action. We conclude that the contract’s venue selection clause, wherein Winewood agreed to venue for “any proceeding or lawsuit ... in Dade County ... or in any other county of Miami Elevator Company’s choice,” is clear and dispositive of the venue issue under consideration. Miami Elevator Company’s decision to file suit in Dade County was within its rights, as per the terms of the contract. See Producers Supply v. Harz, 149 Fla. 594, 6 So.2d 375 (1942); Hallmark Indus., Inc. v. Scarborough Chems., Inc., 409 So.2d 216 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Honea v. Walker Chem. & Exterminating Co., Inc., 393 So.2d 1210 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

We reverse the lower court’s order and remand for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miami Elevator Co. v. Winewood Park Ltd. Partnership, 750 So. 2d 151, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 896, 2000 WL 121405 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

750 So. 2d 151 (Miami Elevator Co. v. Winewood Park Ltd. Partnership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Honea v. WALKER CHEM & EXTERMINATING
393 So. 2d 1210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Producers Supply, Inc. v. Harz
6 So. 2d 375 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)
Hallmark Industries, Inc. v. Scarborough Chemicals, Inc.
409 So. 2d 216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)