Miami Elevator Co. v. Winewood Park Ltd. Partnership

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Miami Elevator Co. v. Winewood Park Ltd. Partnership

750 So. 2d 151, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 896, 2000 WL 121405

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 2, 2000

DocketNo. 3D99-2347

StatusPublished

This text of 750 So. 2d 151 (Miami Elevator Co. v. Winewood Park Ltd. Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miami Elevator Co. v. Winewood Park Ltd. Partnership, 750 So. 2d 151, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 896, 2000 WL 121405 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Miami Elevator Company appeals from a non-final order granting Winewood Park Limited Partnership’s, (Winewood) motion to transfer venue in this breach of contract action. We conclude that the contract’s venue selection clause, wherein Winewood agreed to venue for “any proceeding or lawsuit ... in Dade County ... or in any other county of Miami Elevator Company’s choice,” is clear and dispositive of the venue issue under consideration. Miami Elevator Company’s decision to file suit in Dade County was within its rights, as per the terms of the contract. See Producers Supply v. Harz, 149 Fla. 594, 6 So.2d 375 (1942); Hallmark Indus., Inc. v. Scarborough Chems., Inc., 409 So.2d 216 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Honea v. Walker Chem. & Exterminating Co., Inc., 393 So.2d 1210 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

We reverse the lower court’s order and remand for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Miami Elevator Company appeals from a non-final order granting Winewood Park Limited Partnership’s, (Winewood) motion to transfer venue in this breach of contract action. We conclude that the contract’s venue selection clause, wherein Winewood agreed to venue for “any proceeding or lawsuit ... in Dade County ... or in any other county of Miami Elevator Company’s choice,” is clear and dispositive of the venue issue under consideration. Miami Elevator Company’s decision to file suit in Dade County was within its rights, as per the terms of the contract. See Producers Supply v. Harz, 149 Fla. 594, 6 So.2d 375 (1942); Hallmark Indus., Inc. v. Scarborough Chems., Inc., 409 So.2d 216 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Honea v. Walker Chem. & Exterminating Co., Inc., 393 So.2d 1210 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

We reverse the lower court’s order and remand for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

750 So. 2d 151, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 896, 2000 WL 121405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miami-elevator-co-v-winewood-park-ltd-partnership-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack