Miami Drug Exchange, Inc. v. Tax Assessor

Miami-Dade County Circuit Court

Miami Drug Exchange, Inc. v. Tax Assessor

21 Fla. Supp. 112

CourtCircuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County

DecidedFebruary 4, 1963

DocketNo. 62-C-12820

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Fla. Supp. 112 (Miami Drug Exchange, Inc. v. Tax Assessor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miami Drug Exchange, Inc. v. Tax Assessor, 21 Fla. Supp. 112 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PAT CANNON, Circuit Judge.

This cause came on to be heard after due notice with argument of counsel on the defendants’ motion to dismiss.

The court finds that the complaint fails to allege that its property has been assessed in excess of actual full cash value, further that the plaintiff has not complied with provisions of §196.01, Florida Statutes, set forth below —

“ . . . provided that the complainant shall in every case tender into court and file with the complaint the full amount of any such tax, assessment or toll which he shall admit to be legal and due by him, or file with the complaint a receipt showing payment of the same prior to the institution of the suit.”

The defective complaint cannot be cured by amendment at this late date. The motion to dismiss is well taken, and it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff’s complaint in this cause be and the same is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, and at the cost of plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PAT CANNON, Circuit Judge.

This cause came on to be heard after due notice with argument of counsel on the defendants’ motion to dismiss.

The court finds that the complaint fails to allege that its property has been assessed in excess of actual full cash value, further that the plaintiff has not complied with provisions of §196.01, Florida Statutes, set forth below —

“ . . . provided that the complainant shall in every case tender into court and file with the complaint the full amount of any such tax, assessment or toll which he shall admit to be legal and due by him, or file with the complaint a receipt showing payment of the same prior to the institution of the suit.”

The defective complaint cannot be cured by amendment at this late date. The motion to dismiss is well taken, and it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff’s complaint in this cause be and the same is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, and at the cost of plaintiff.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Fla. Supp. 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miami-drug-exchange-inc-v-tax-assessor-flacirct11mia-1963.