Miami Dairy Farms, Inc. v. Tinsley

155 So. 852, 115 Fla. 164, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1479
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 30, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 155 So. 852 (Miami Dairy Farms, Inc. v. Tinsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miami Dairy Farms, Inc. v. Tinsley, 155 So. 852, 115 Fla. 164, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1479 (Fla. 1934).

Opinion

Whitfield, P. J.

In an action brought under Section 7049 (4962), C. G. L., by the father against Miami Dairy Farms, Inc., for the wrongful death of his minor son, aged ten years', damages were claimed for loss of the son’s services to the father and for mental pain and suffering of the two parents. The jury returned a verdict for $1,000.00 damages.

On motion of the plaintiff father,- the court granted a new trial on the ground that the damages awarded in the verdict were inadequate. The defendant took writ of error under the statute, Sec. 4615 (2905), C. G. L.

*165 The order granting a new trial is affirmed on the authority of DeVane v. Bauman, 82 Fla. 346, 90 So. 192, which was cited by the trial judge in his order. See also Miami Dairy Farms, Inc., v. Tinsley as Administrator, filed this day.

The amount of the recovery should be reasonable recompense for parental mental pain and suffering and the value at the date of the trial of fair compensation for services which in reasonable probability the child would have rendered to the parents during the period from the wrongful death to the date when the child would have become twenty-one years of age.

Affirmed.

Brown and Buford, J. J., concur. Davis, C. J., and Terrell, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gresham v. Courson
177 So. 2d 33 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
C. W. Latimer, Jr. v. Sears Roebuck and Company
285 F.2d 152 (Fifth Circuit, 1960)
Winner v. Sharp
43 So. 2d 634 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1949)
Powell v. Marcus
172 So. 857 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Miami Dairy Farms, Inc. v. Tinsley
164 So. 528 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 So. 852, 115 Fla. 164, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miami-dairy-farms-inc-v-tinsley-fla-1934.