Miami-Dade County v. Mitchell

754 So. 2d 773, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2631, 2000 WL 266320
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 13, 2000·No. No. 1D98-3686·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, the self-insured employer appeals, and the claimant cross-appeals. Having carefully considered the plethora of issues raised, we reverse that portion of the order which directs the employer to pay for medical services provided by Dr. Abeckjerr from the date of the accident until February 14, 1997, because we conclude that it was an abuse of discretion to excuse the doctor’s failure to comply with the requirements of section 440.13(3)(a) and (4)(a), Florida Statutes (1995). (Section 440.13(2)(c) provides authority for that portion of the order which directs the employer to pay for services provided by the doctor from February 14, 1997, to the date of maximum medical improvement.) We also reverse that portion of the order which directs the employer to pay for future medical care, and remand for further consideration of whether the November 11, 1995, accident was the “major contributing cause” of the need for future treatment, in light of our recent decision in Closet Maid v. Sykes, 25 Fla. L. Weekly D459, — So.2d -, 2000 WL 155878 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. 15, 2000) (en banc). In all other respects, we affirm.

Affirmed in part; reversed IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

KAHN,-WEBSTER and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miami-Dade County v. Mitchell, 754 So. 2d 773, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2631, 2000 WL 266320 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

754 So. 2d 773 (Miami-Dade County v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miami-Dade County v. Mitchell
835 So. 2d 1196 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Mitchell v. Metro Dade
797 So. 2d 10 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)