Miami-Dade County v. Laureiro

894 So. 2d 268, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17877, 2004 WL 2730776
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 24, 2004·No. No. 3D03-3115·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the verdict may include amounts for medical bills beyond those actually paid by Medicare, the judgment under review, while otherwise affirmed, is vacated and the cause remanded on the authority of Thyssenkrupp Elevator Co. v. Lasky, 868 So.2d 547 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), review dismissed, 873 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 2004) and Cooperative Leasing, Inc. v. Johnson, 872 So.2d 956 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), review granted, 884 So.2d 22 (Fla. Case no. SC04-1021, September 10, 2004)(table). As stated in Thyssenkrupp, 868 So.2d at 550,

[o]n remand the trial court is authorized to receive such evidence as may be necessary to fix the precise amount of the reduction [if any] required by our decision today.

Affirmed in part, vacated in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miami-Dade County v. Laureiro, 894 So. 2d 268, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17877, 2004 WL 2730776 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

894 So. 2d 268 (Miami-Dade County v. Laureiro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Harrell
53 So. 3d 1084 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Cases v. Gray
894 So. 2d 268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)