Miami-Dade County v. Herndon

776 So. 2d 360, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 834, 2001 WL 76702
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 31, 2001·No. No. 3D00-208·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Miami-Dade County appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to a verdict in a personal injury case. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

At no point during this litigation did the plaintiff plead or prove actual or constructive knowledge on the part of the County so as to impose liability on the County for the trip and fall. Because of the utter absence of such evidence, the verdict and judgment cannot stand. See Grier v. Metropolitan Dade County, 660 So.2d 273, 275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (“In order to establish a prima facie claim for negligence, a plaintiff must show that defendant had either actual or constructive notice of the alleged negligent condition.”). Accordingly, the trial court erred in denying the County’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and then again erred in denying the County’s Motion for a Directed Verdict.

Reversed and remanded with directions to enter judgment for the County.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miami-Dade County v. Herndon, 776 So. 2d 360, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 834, 2001 WL 76702 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

776 So. 2d 360 (Miami-Dade County v. Herndon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rivas v. Miami-Dade Cnty.
239 So. 3d 791 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Superior Ins. Co. v. Libert
776 So. 2d 360 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)