Miami Coliseum Corp. v. Gallup

Supreme Court of Florida

Miami Coliseum Corp. v. Gallup

136 So. 607, 102 Fla. 915

DecidedSeptember 14, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 136 So. 607 (Miami Coliseum Corp. v. Gallup) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miami Coliseum Corp. v. Gallup, 136 So. 607, 102 Fla. 915 (Fla. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the final decree-entered by the Court on January 30, A. D. 1929, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said final decree appealed from. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. It is further ordered that the copy of the alleged decree of confirmation of sale appearing in the transcript be stricken from the transcript of the record because of the showing that such decree was inadvertently entered and subsequently revoked by the chancellor who signed it.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the final decree-entered by the Court on January 30, A. D. 1929, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said final decree appealed from. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. It is further ordered that the copy of the alleged decree of confirmation of sale appearing in the transcript be stricken from the transcript of the record because of the showing that such decree was inadvertently entered and subsequently revoked by the chancellor who signed it.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield and Davis, J.J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 So. 607, 102 Fla. 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miami-coliseum-corp-v-gallup-fla-1931.