Miami Beach Railway Co. v. Perkins

Supreme Court of Florida

Miami Beach Railway Co. v. Perkins

143 So. 297, 106 Fla. 454

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided August 10, 1932·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen *455 and inspected, the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to' the Court that there is no error in said judgment. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen *455 and inspected, the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to' the Court that there is no error in said judgment. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Miami Beach Railway Co. v. Perkins, 143 So. 297, 106 Fla. 454 (Fla. 1932).

Pincite

143 So. 297 (Miami Beach Railway Co. v. Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.