Miami Beach First National Bank v. Tropical Park, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Miami Beach First National Bank v. Tropical Park, Inc.

215 So. 2d 752, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 4857

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 26, 1968

DocketNo. 68-460

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 215 So. 2d 752 (Miami Beach First National Bank v. Tropical Park, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miami Beach First National Bank v. Tropical Park, Inc., 215 So. 2d 752, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 4857 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, defendants in the trial court, seek review of an adverse final judgment rendered by the trial court in a non-jury action.

The appellee-plaintiff sued for monies due it from the late William B. MacDonald, Jr. The defense was that the sums, admitted as correct, were not recoverable because of an executed general release. The trial judge found that the particular indebtedness involved was not covered by the general release, upon the authority of Ormsby v. Ginolfi, Fla.App.1958, 107 So.2d 272; Graham v. Taller & Cooper, Inc., E.D.N.Y. 1950, 91 F.Supp. 419; Simon v. Simon, 274 App.Div. 447, 84 N.Y.S.2d 307; 76 C.J.S. Release § 52; Anno. 171 A.L.R. 185.

It is generally a question of fact wherein parol evidence is accepted, notwithstanding the written agreement to determine if an item which is not mentioned in a release was to be included therein. Bruce Construction Corporation v. Federal Realty Corporation, 104 Fla. 93, 139 So. 209; Ormsby v. Ginolfi, supra; Florida State Turnpike Authority v. Industrial Construction Company, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 115; 28 Fla.Jur., Release, §§ 17, 18.

We find substantial, competent evidence in the record to support the trial judge’s finding. Therefore, the same and the final judgment here under review should not be disturbed on appeal. Dade County, By and Through Bd. of County Com’rs. v. Pepper, Fla.App. 1964, 168 So.2d 198; Leeb v. Read, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 830; Gaisford v. Frostman, Fla.App. 1967, 202 So.2d 790; Southeast Foods, Inc. v. Penguin Frozen Foods, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 39.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, defendants in the trial court, seek review of an adverse final judgment rendered by the trial court in a non-jury action.

The appellee-plaintiff sued for monies due it from the late William B. MacDonald, Jr. The defense was that the sums, admitted as correct, were not recoverable because of an executed general release. The trial judge found that the particular indebtedness involved was not covered by the general release, upon the authority of Ormsby v. Ginolfi, Fla.App.1958, 107 So.2d 272; Graham v. Taller & Cooper, Inc., E.D.N.Y. 1950, 91 F.Supp. 419; Simon v. Simon, 274 App.Div. 447, 84 N.Y.S.2d 307; 76 C.J.S. Release § 52; Anno. 171 A.L.R. 185.

It is generally a question of fact wherein parol evidence is accepted, notwithstanding the written agreement to determine if an item which is not mentioned in a release was to be included therein. Bruce Construction Corporation v. Federal Realty Corporation, 104 Fla. 93, 139 So. 209; Ormsby v. Ginolfi, supra; Florida State Turnpike Authority v. Industrial Construction Company, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 115; 28 Fla.Jur., Release, §§ 17, 18.

We find substantial, competent evidence in the record to support the trial judge’s finding. Therefore, the same and the final judgment here under review should not be disturbed on appeal. Dade County, By and Through Bd. of County Com’rs. v. Pepper, Fla.App. 1964, 168 So.2d 198; Leeb v. Read, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 830; Gaisford v. Frostman, Fla.App. 1967, 202 So.2d 790; Southeast Foods, Inc. v. Penguin Frozen Foods, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 39.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 So. 2d 752, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 4857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miami-beach-first-national-bank-v-tropical-park-inc-fladistctapp-1968.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack