Miami Beach Elec. Co. v. Bailey and Hus.

107 So. 643, 91 Fla. 410
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 1, 1926·Published

Opinion

*411 Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the eo(urt that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and . Terrell and Buford, J. J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miami Beach Elec. Co. v. Bailey and Hus., 107 So. 643, 91 Fla. 410 (Fla. 1926).

107 So. 643 (Miami Beach Elec. Co. v. Bailey and Hus.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.