Mia Abrams v. State
This text of Mia Abrams v. State (Mia Abrams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 12, 2006.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-06-00751-CR
MIA ABRAMS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 176th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 832,176
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an attempted appeal from the denial of appellant=s motion to recuse the trial judge. On September12, 2006, the court notified the parties that an interlocutory ruling on a motion to recuse is not an appealable order, and the court would consider dismissal of the appeal unless grounds for maintaining jurisdiction were demonstrated. Appellant responded by filing a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction, acknowledging that the denial of recusal is reviewable on appeal from the final judgment. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a(f).
Accordingly, we grant the motion and order the appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed October 12, 2006.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Seymore.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mia Abrams v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mia-abrams-v-state-texapp-2006.