Mia Abrams v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 12, 2006·No. 14-06-00751-CR·Published

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 12, 2006

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 12, 2006.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-00751-CR

____________

MIA ABRAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 832,176

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal from the denial of appellant=s motion to recuse the trial judge.  On September12, 2006, the court notified the parties that an interlocutory ruling on a motion to recuse is not an appealable order, and the court would consider dismissal of the appeal unless grounds for maintaining jurisdiction were demonstrated.  Appellant responded by filing a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction, acknowledging that the denial of recusal is reviewable on appeal from the final judgment.  See Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a(f). 


Accordingly, we grant the motion and order the appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed October 12, 2006.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Seymore.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mia Abrams v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Mia Abrams v. State (Mia Abrams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.