Mi Comp Cannabis Law Reform Comm v. Secy of State
This text of Mi Comp Cannabis Law Reform Comm v. Secy of State (Mi Comp Cannabis Law Reform Comm v. Secy of State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
September 7, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
154334 Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein MICHIGAN COMPREHENSIVE CANNABIS Joan L. Larsen, LAW REFORM COMMITTEE, a/k/a Justices MILEGALIZE, Plaintiff, v SC: 154334 SECRETARY OF STATE, BUREAU OF ELECTIONS, and BOARD OF STATE CANVASSERS, Defendants.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 7, 2016 p0906 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mi Comp Cannabis Law Reform Comm v. Secy of State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mi-comp-cannabis-law-reform-comm-v-secy-of-state-mich-2016.