MHI Partnership, Ltd. v. Culver

940 S.W.2d 597, 40 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 200, 1996 Tex. LEXIS 169, 1996 WL 723339
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 13, 1996
DocketNo. 96-0680
StatusPublished

This text of 940 S.W.2d 597 (MHI Partnership, Ltd. v. Culver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MHI Partnership, Ltd. v. Culver, 940 S.W.2d 597, 40 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 200, 1996 Tex. LEXIS 169, 1996 WL 723339 (Tex. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Relators seek mandamus relief from the trial court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration. The real parties in interest contend that relators waived any right to arbitration by waiting too long after the litigation commenced to assert it. Relators contend that they did not move to compel arbitration immediately after suit was filed because they did not have a copy of the arbitration agree[598]*598ment in their files, and that they moved to compel arbitration within a few days after they discovered the agreement. We believe the trial court should have the opportunity to reconsider its ruling in light of our recent opinion in EZ Pawn Corporation v. Mandas, 934 S.W.2d 87 (Tex.1996) (per curiam). Accordingly, we overrule the motion for leave to file without addressing the merits of the motion or the petition for writ of mandamus, and without prejudice to relators’ again requesting relief from the court of appeals and this Court after the trial court has had an opportunity to reconsider its ruling.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

EZ Pawn Corp. v. Mancias
934 S.W.2d 87 (Texas Supreme Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
940 S.W.2d 597, 40 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 200, 1996 Tex. LEXIS 169, 1996 WL 723339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mhi-partnership-ltd-v-culver-tex-1996.