Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/M.H. v. State

M.H. v. State

949 So. 2d 1183, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3016, 2007 WL 620972
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in M.H. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4951 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 2, 2007·No. No. 1D06-3571·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See A.C.N. v. State, 727 So.2d 368, 371 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (“Although the principal focus of the juvenile system is rehabilitation, with the aim of preventing further delinquent or criminal acts, the protection of society and punishment of the child are appropriate considerations.”) (citations omitted).

BARFIELD, BENTON, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M.H. v. State, 949 So. 2d 1183, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3016, 2007 WL 620972 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

949 So. 2d 1183 (M.H. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Interest of A.C.N. v. State
727 So. 2d 368 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)