M.H. v. State
633 So. 2d 1067, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 146, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 406, 1994 WL 92089
Opinion
We review the decision of the district court of appeal in M.H. v. State, 622 So.2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), on the ground of certified conflict. Art V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
On the authority of our recent decision in Brown v. State, 629 So.2d 841 (Fla.1994), we [1068]*1068quash the decision under review and remand for proceedings consistent with our opinion in Brown.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
M.H. v. State, 633 So. 2d 1067, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 146, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 406, 1994 WL 92089 (Fla. 1994).
633 So. 2d 1067 (M.H. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. State
629 So. 2d 841 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
M.H. v. State
622 So. 2d 105 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)