M.H. v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

M.H. v. State

955 S.W.2d 911, 330 Ark. 850

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedDecember 19, 1997

Docket97-1439

StatusPublished

This text of 955 S.W.2d 911 (M.H. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M.H. v. State, 955 S.W.2d 911, 330 Ark. 850 (Ark. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant, M. H., has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Lewis W. Littlepage, admits fault for tendering the record late in his client’s juvenile delinquency case.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney here, is good cause to grant the motion. See Hansberry v. State, 318 Ark. 757, 887 S.W.2d 308 (1994). A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellant, M. H., has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Lewis W. Littlepage, admits fault for tendering the record late in his client’s juvenile delinquency case.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney here, is good cause to grant the motion. See Hansberry v. State, 318 Ark. 757, 887 S.W.2d 308 (1994). A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

955 S.W.2d 911, 330 Ark. 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mh-v-state-ark-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack