MGO, LLC v. Accessology Too, LLC, Kristi Avalos, Individually, Thomas Avalos, Individually, Ovations Academy, a Texas Nonprofit Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 16, 2023
Docket05-23-00100-CV
StatusPublished

This text of MGO, LLC v. Accessology Too, LLC, Kristi Avalos, Individually, Thomas Avalos, Individually, Ovations Academy, a Texas Nonprofit Corporation (MGO, LLC v. Accessology Too, LLC, Kristi Avalos, Individually, Thomas Avalos, Individually, Ovations Academy, a Texas Nonprofit Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MGO, LLC v. Accessology Too, LLC, Kristi Avalos, Individually, Thomas Avalos, Individually, Ovations Academy, a Texas Nonprofit Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

ACCEPTED 05-23-00100-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 10/16/2023 6:14 PM RUBEN MORIN CLERK

COURT OF APPEALS NO. 05-23-00100-CV TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. 471-04473-2020 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS MGO, LLC § IN THE 5TH C OURT TEXAS DALLAS, APPELLANT, § 10/16/2023 6:14:12 PM § Ruben Morin Clerk V. § OF APPEALS § ACCESSOLOGY TOO, LLC, KRISTI § AVALOS, INDIVIDUALLY, THOMAS § AVALOS, INDIVIDUALLY, OVATIONS § ACADEMY, A TEXAS NONPROFIT § CORPORATION, § APPELLEE § DALLAS, TEXAS

APPELLEES’ THIRD MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLEES’ BRIEF TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Appellees’ Accessology Too, LLC, Kristi Avalos, Individually, and Thomas Avalos, Individually, by and through their attorney of record, W. Chandler Cramer, pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b) and 38.6(d), and files this Third Motion to Extend Time to File Appellee’s Brief and would respectfully show the Court as follows:

1. This Case is on appeal from the 471st Judicial District Court.

2. Appellant filed its brief on July 17, 2023.

3. Appellees’ brief is due October 16, 2023. Appellees’ were previously given two (2) extensions.

4. Appellees request a 30-day extension, which would make the brief

due on November 15, 2023.

Page 1 Of 3 5. Appellees’ counsel is requesting a 30-day extension because Appellees’ recently hired W. Chandler Cramer on October 16, 2023 and he has been unable to complete the research and drafting necessary to respond to Appellant’s brief. In accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b) and Hone v. Hanafine, 104 S.W.3d 884, 886 (Tex. 2003), Appellees move this Court for a third extension to file its brief to November 15, 2023. Appellees’ failure to file the brief by October 16, 2023 was not deliberate or intentional. Appellee’s were unable to find and hire additional counsel within enough time for the additional counsel to prepare and file the brief between the September 15, 2023 deadline and the October 16, 2023 extended deadline. Appellees’ desire to file a brief and respectfully request a third extension of time to do so.

6. Alternatively, Appellees’ would respectfully request a 15-day extension to file its brief on October 31, 2023. This would allow Appellees’ to file a brief without delaying this cause.

Accordingly, Appellees request an extension until November 15, 2023, or, alternatively until October 31, 2023, to file its responsive brief in this cause.

Respectfully submitted,

CRAMER-LEGAL, PLLC 1901 Central Drive, Suite 417 Bedford, Texas 76021

/s/ W. Chandler Cramer W. Chandler Cramer Bar no: 24125186 Phone: (940) 453-5827 Fax: (940) 205-5024 Email: chandler@cramer-legal.com

Page 2 Of 3 Certificate of Conference Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a)(5), I certify that I made a reasonable attempt to confer with all other parties about the merits of the motion and whether those parties oppose the motion. I called Niles Illich’s office twice but was unable to reach him on the afternoon of October 16, 2023.

/s/ W. Chandler Cramer W. Chandler Cramer

Certificate of Service I certify that a true copy of this document was served via electronic filing manager in accordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on all counsel on October 16, 2023.

Page 3 Of 3 Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.

William Cramer on behalf of William Cramer Bar No. 24125186 williamcramer@tamu.edu Envelope ID: 80649882 Filing Code Description: Motion Filing Description: Motion Status as of 10/17/2023 7:14 AM CST

Associated Case Party: Accessology Too, LLC

Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status

Joshua Graham eservice@joshuagraham.com 10/16/2023 6:14:12 PM SENT

W. Chandler Cramer chandler@cramer-legal.com 10/16/2023 6:14:12 PM SENT

Associated Case Party: Thomas Avalos

Joshua Graham eservice@joshuagraham.com 10/16/2023 6:14:12 PM SENT

Associated Case Party: Kristi Avalos

Joshua Graham eservice@joshuagraham.com 10/16/2023 6:14:12 PM SENT

Associated Case Party: MGO, LLC

NIles Illich niles@scottpalmerlaw.com 10/16/2023 6:14:12 PM SENT

Case Contacts

Joshua Graham jsg@joshuagraham.com 10/16/2023 6:14:12 PM SENT

Robert Richardson ed@richardsonfirm.net 10/16/2023 6:14:12 PM SENT

Lauren Lewison lauren@scottpalmerlaw.com 10/16/2023 6:14:12 PM SENT Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.

William Cramer on behalf of William Cramer Bar No. 24125186 williamcramer@tamu.edu Envelope ID: 80649882 Filing Code Description: Motion Filing Description: Motion Status as of 10/17/2023 7:14 AM CST

Associated Case Party: Ovations Academy, a Texas Nonprofit Corporation

Kevin Smith kcsmith@joshuagraham.com 10/16/2023 6:14:12 PM SENT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hone v. Hanafin
104 S.W.3d 884 (Texas Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MGO, LLC v. Accessology Too, LLC, Kristi Avalos, Individually, Thomas Avalos, Individually, Ovations Academy, a Texas Nonprofit Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mgo-llc-v-accessology-too-llc-kristi-avalos-individually-thomas-texapp-2023.