M'Gilvery v. Moorhead

3 Cal. 267
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1853
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Cal. 267 (M'Gilvery v. Moorhead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
M'Gilvery v. Moorhead, 3 Cal. 267 (Cal. 1853).

Opinion

Murray, Chief Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court. Heydenfeldt, Justice, concurred.

This appeal is prosecuted from the order of the court below, granting a new trial. The only question for our consideration [271]*271is, whether Chapman should have been joined as a co-plaintiff. It is evident that if the plaintiff relied upon the original contract between Chapman, himself, and the defendants, he could not sue without joining Chapman.

There is, on the other hand, no sufficient proof going to establish the alteration of the original or the substitution of a new and independent contract, and even if there was, the instructions refused by the court in relation thereto would be error.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Cal. 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mgilvery-v-moorhead-cal-1853.