M'Gill v. Perrigo

9 Johns. 259
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1812·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A scire facias to revive a judgment is a continuation of a former suit; and the venue ought to be laid in the county in which it was laid in the original action. The English practice is decisive. (Chitty's Plead. 272. Tidd’s Prac. 1035. Hob. 4. Yelv. 218. Cro. Jac. 231.)

Rule granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M'Gill v. Perrigo, 9 Johns. 259 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1812).

9 Johns. 259 (M'Gill v. Perrigo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lafayette County v. Wonderly
92 F. 313 (Eighth Circuit, 1899)
State v. Hoeffner
28 S.W. 1 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
Pollard v. Eckford
50 Miss. 631 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1874)