M'Gill v. Perrigo
9 Johns. 259
This text of 9 Johns. 259 (M'Gill v. Perrigo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
M'Gill v. Perrigo, 9 Johns. 259 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1812).
Opinion
A scire facias to revive a judgment is a continuation of a former suit; and the venue ought to be laid in the county in which it was laid in the original action. The English practice is decisive. (Chitty's Plead. 272. Tidd’s Prac. 1035. Hob. 4. Yelv. 218. Cro. Jac. 231.)
Rule granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lafayette County v. Wonderly
92 F. 313 (Eighth Circuit, 1899)
State v. Hoeffner
28 S.W. 1 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
Pollard v. Eckford
50 Miss. 631 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1874)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 Johns. 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mgill-v-perrigo-nysupct-1812.