Mga, Inc. v. Goellner, No. Cv96 0154820 S (May 28, 1997)

Connecticut Superior Court

Mga, Inc. v. Goellner, No. Cv96 0154820 S (May 28, 1997)

1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 6112

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided May 28, 1997·No. No. CV96 0154820 S CT Page 6113·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO DISMISS (#103) Except as otherwise provided, service of process upon a nonresident individual subject to the personal jurisdiction of the courts of this state may be accomplished either by leaving a copy of it with the defendant or at his usual place of abode pursuant to General Statutes §§ 52-57 and 52-57a, or by leaving a copy thereof with the secretary of state and sending a copy with the secretary's endorsement to the defendant at his last-known address by registered or certified mail pursuant to General Statutes § 52-59b (c). See Anderson v. Schibi,33 Conn. Sup. 562, 565-66, 364 A.2d 853 (App. Sess. 1976). As demonstrated by the sheriff's return, defendant Goellner was served by certified mail. This procedure is not authorized by statute. Accordingly, the defendant's motion to dismiss (#103) for insufficiency of service of process is granted.

RYAN, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO DISMISS (#103) Except as otherwise provided, service of process upon a nonresident individual subject to the personal jurisdiction of the courts of this state may be accomplished either by leaving a copy of it with the defendant or at his usual place of abode pursuant to General Statutes §§ 52-57 and 52-57a, or by leaving a copy thereof with the secretary of state and sending a copy with the secretary's endorsement to the defendant at his last-known address by registered or certified mail pursuant to General Statutes § 52-59b (c). See Anderson v. Schibi,33 Conn. Sup. 562, 565-66, 364 A.2d 853 (App. Sess. 1976). As demonstrated by the sheriff's return, defendant Goellner was served by certified mail. This procedure is not authorized by statute. Accordingly, the defendant's motion to dismiss (#103) for insufficiency of service of process is granted.

RYAN, J.

Mga, Inc. v. Goellner, No. Cv96 0154820 S (May 28, 1997), 1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 6112 (Colo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 6112 (Mga, Inc. v. Goellner, No. Cv96 0154820 S (May 28, 1997)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related