Mga, Inc. v. Goellner, No. Cv96 0154820 S (May 28, 1997)

Connecticut Superior Court

Mga, Inc. v. Goellner, No. Cv96 0154820 S (May 28, 1997)

1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 6112

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedMay 28, 1997

DocketNo. CV96 0154820 S CT Page 6113

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 6112 (Mga, Inc. v. Goellner, No. Cv96 0154820 S (May 28, 1997)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mga, Inc. v. Goellner, No. Cv96 0154820 S (May 28, 1997), 1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 6112 (Colo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO DISMISS (#103) Except as otherwise provided, service of process upon a nonresident individual subject to the personal jurisdiction of the courts of this state may be accomplished either by leaving a copy of it with the defendant or at his usual place of abode pursuant to General Statutes §§ 52-57 and 52-57a, or by leaving a copy thereof with the secretary of state and sending a copy with the secretary's endorsement to the defendant at his last-known address by registered or certified mail pursuant to General Statutes § 52-59b (c). See Anderson v. Schibi,33 Conn. Sup. 562, 565-66, 364 A.2d 853 (App. Sess. 1976). As demonstrated by the sheriff's return, defendant Goellner was served by certified mail. This procedure is not authorized by statute. Accordingly, the defendant's motion to dismiss (#103) for insufficiency of service of process is granted.

RYAN, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO DISMISS (#103) Except as otherwise provided, service of process upon a nonresident individual subject to the personal jurisdiction of the courts of this state may be accomplished either by leaving a copy of it with the defendant or at his usual place of abode pursuant to General Statutes §§ 52-57 and 52-57a, or by leaving a copy thereof with the secretary of state and sending a copy with the secretary's endorsement to the defendant at his last-known address by registered or certified mail pursuant to General Statutes § 52-59b (c). See Anderson v. Schibi,33 Conn. Sup. 562, 565-66, 364 A.2d 853 (App. Sess. 1976). As demonstrated by the sheriff's return, defendant Goellner was served by certified mail. This procedure is not authorized by statute. Accordingly, the defendant's motion to dismiss (#103) for insufficiency of service of process is granted.

RYAN, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 6112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mga-inc-v-goellner-no-cv96-0154820-s-may-28-1997-connsuperct-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack