Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/M.G. v. State

M.G. v. State

533 So. 2d 894, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2473, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4867, 1988 WL 117614
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 8, 1988
DocketNo. 88-564
StatusPublished

This text of 533 So. 2d 894 (M.G. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
M.G. v. State, 533 So. 2d 894, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2473, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4867, 1988 WL 117614 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

M.G. appeals from an order of the trial court finding him guilty of carrying a concealed weapon in violation of section 790.-01, Florida Statutes (1987). We perceive no difference between a partially concealed firearm and a partially concealed wooden club and, accordingly, affirm the order under review. Ensor v. State, 403 So.2d 349 (Fla.1981) (object partially hidden under automobile floor mat and believed by trained police officer to be weapon would not preclude weapon from also being a “concealed weapon” within meaning of statute prohibiting carrying concealed weapon).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ensor v. State
403 So. 2d 349 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
533 So. 2d 894, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2473, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4867, 1988 WL 117614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mg-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.