M'Farland v. Hall
3 Watts 37
Opinion
It is conceded that there was no delivery of possession under the contract; and it is therefore in effect conceded that there was no part execution of the contract to take it out of the stat-, me of frauds.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
M'Farland v. Hall, 3 Watts 37 (Pa. 1834).
3 Watts 37 (M'Farland v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Allen's Estate
1 Watts & Serg. 383 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1841)
M'Kee v. Phillips
9 Watts 85 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1839)