Mezzacapo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided February 23, 2022·No. 18-1977·Unpublished

Opinion

Sn the Guited States Court of Federal Clanns

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-1977V Filed: January 25, 2022 UNPUBLISHED

MICHAEL MEZZACAPO, Petitioner, ; Vv Joint Stipulation on Damages; Influenza (“Flu”) vaccine; Tetanus, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND diphtheria, acellular pertussis HUMAN SERVICES (“Tdap”) vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration Respondent. (SSIRVA")

Leah Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Voris E. Johnson, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION"

On December 27, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,* (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a right Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA’). Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed January 25, 2022, at J 4. Petitioner further alleges that he has experienced the residual effects of his condition for more than six months, that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages as a result of his condition, and that his vaccines were administered in the United States. Petition at 2; Stipulation at Jf] 3-5. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a Table SIRVA within the Table timeframe, and denies that the Tdap vaccine and/or flu vaccine in fact caused his alleged shoulder injury and residual effects, or any other injury.” Stipulation at {| 6.

Nevertheless, on January 25, 2022, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. | find the stipulation

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this case, it will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. See 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, it will be redacted from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).

reasonable and adopt it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, | award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $50,532.58 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Stipulation at J 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under § 15(a). /d.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. *

ITIS SO ORDERED. s/Daniel T. Horner

Daniel T. Horner Special Master

? Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) MICHAEL MEZZACAPO, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 18-1977V (ECF) Vv. ) Special Master Horner ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Michael Mezzacapo (“petitioner”) filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (the “Vaccine Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly sustained following petitioner’s receipt of a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine, which vaccine is

contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table’’), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received Tdap and influenza (“flu”) vaccines on August 29, 2017. 3. The vaccines were administered within the United States. 4, Petitioner alleges that he sustained the first symptom or manifestation of onset of

a right Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) within the time period set forth in the Table. Petitioner further alleges that he experienced the residual effects of his SIRVA for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil

action for damages as a result of his condition.

6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a Table SIRVA within the Table timeframe, and denies that the Tdap vaccine and/or flu vaccine in fact caused his alleged shoulder injury and residual effects, or any other injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $50,532.58 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Michael Mezzacapo, which amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition.

10. _ Petitioner and his attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or

State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1396

et seq.), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 and any amounts awarded pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i), subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.

12. The parties and their attorneys further agree and stipulate that, except for any award for attorneys’ fees and litigation costs, the money provided pursuant to this Stipulation will be used solely for the benefit of petitioner, as contemplated by a strict construction of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) and (d), and subject to the conditions of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g) and (h).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mezzacapo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2022).

Mezzacapo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Mezzacapo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a