Meza v. State
This text of 551 So. 2d 600 (Meza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s convictions of armed kidnapping, armed sexual battery, armed burglary of a dwelling and burglary of a conveyance. We also affirm the sentence imposed for Count IV, armed burglary of a dwelling. The state concedes error in sentencing on Counts I, II, III and V. We agree and reverse for resentencing on these counts.
We also strike the imposition of costs and attorney’s fees for failure to give the appellant notice and an opportunity to be heard. Shipley v. State, 528 So.2d 902 (Fla.1988); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
551 So. 2d 600, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2573, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6157, 1989 WL 133055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meza-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.