Meza v. State

551 So. 2d 600, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2573, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6157, 1989 WL 133055
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 8, 1989·No. No. 88-3175·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions of armed kidnapping, armed sexual battery, armed burglary of a dwelling and burglary of a conveyance. We also affirm the sentence imposed for Count IV, armed burglary of a dwelling. The state concedes error in sentencing on Counts I, II, III and V. We agree and reverse for resentencing on these counts.

We also strike the imposition of costs and attorney’s fees for failure to give the appellant notice and an opportunity to be heard. Shipley v. State, 528 So.2d 902 (Fla.1988); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meza v. State, 551 So. 2d 600, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2573, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6157, 1989 WL 133055 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

551 So. 2d 600 (Meza v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Martin
551 So. 2d 600 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)