Meza v. Holder

473 F. App'x 763
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 5, 2012
Docket07-73346
StatusUnpublished

This text of 473 F. App'x 763 (Meza v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meza v. Holder, 473 F. App'x 763 (9th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Petitioner Alfredo Meza is ineligible for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(C), because he has been convicted of two crimes involving moral turpitude, which are offenses under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(I); specifically, he was convicted of a theft in violation of California Penal Code Section 484(a), and check fraud in violation of California Penal Code Section 476a. See Rusz v. Ashcroft, 376 F.3d 1182, 1184 (9th Cir.2004); Burr v. INS, 350 F.2d 87, 91-92 (9th Cir.1965). Although these convictions were subsequently expunged pursuant to state law, such expungement does not change their immigration consequences. See Murillo-Espinoza v. INS, 261 F.3d 771, 774 (9th Cir.2001). Moreover, even if Meza qualified for a discretionary waiver of removability under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h), such a waiver would not erase the crimes alleged to be grounds for removability from his record for immigration purposes. See Becker v. Gonzales, 473 F.3d 1000,1003-04 (9th Cir.2007). DENIED.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
473 F. App'x 763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meza-v-holder-ca9-2012.