Meza v. Consolidated Edison Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meza v. Consolidated Edison Co.

50 A.D.3d 452, 854 N.Y.S.2d 646

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 2008·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered on or about June 12, 2007, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants had no obligation to maintain a constantly dry floor during a snowstorm (see Solazzo v New York City Tr. Auth., 21 AD3d 735 [2005]). Nor were they required to cover the entire floor with mats (Garcia v Delgado Travel Agency, 4 AD3d 204 [2004]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Andrias, Friedman and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered on or about June 12, 2007, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants had no obligation to maintain a constantly dry floor during a snowstorm (see Solazzo v New York City Tr. Auth., 21 AD3d 735 [2005]). Nor were they required to cover the entire floor with mats (Garcia v Delgado Travel Agency, 4 AD3d 204 [2004]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Andrias, Friedman and Sweeny, JJ.

Meza v. Consolidated Edison Co., 50 A.D.3d 452, 854 N.Y.S.2d 646 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

50 A.D.3d 452 (Meza v. Consolidated Edison Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related