Meza v. Consolidated Edison Co.
This text of 50 A.D.3d 452 (Meza v. Consolidated Edison Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered on or about June 12, 2007, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendants had no obligation to maintain a constantly dry floor during a snowstorm (see Solazzo v New York City Tr. Auth., 21 AD3d 735 [2005]). Nor were they required to cover the entire floor with mats (Garcia v Delgado Travel Agency, 4 AD3d 204 [2004]).
We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Andrias, Friedman and Sweeny, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 A.D.3d 452, 854 N.Y.S.2d 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meza-v-consolidated-edison-co-nyappdiv-2008.