Meyrose v. Hockerson

226 S.W.3d 243, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 877, 2007 WL 1673945
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 12, 2007·No. No. ED 88463·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dennis J. Meyrose (Pedestrian) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Marienne A. Hockerson, fik/a Marienne A. Gibson, (Driver) on Pedestrian’s petition for personal injuries and damages, which alleged Driver was liable for injuries Pedestrian sustained when Driver’s car struck Pedestrian.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meyrose v. Hockerson, 226 S.W.3d 243, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 877, 2007 WL 1673945 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

226 S.W.3d 243 (Meyrose v. Hockerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.