Meyn v. Meyn

119 A.D.2d 645, 501 N.Y.S.2d 88, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55569
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 14, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 119 A.D.2d 645 (Meyn v. Meyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meyn v. Meyn, 119 A.D.2d 645, 501 N.Y.S.2d 88, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55569 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

— In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), dated January 9, 1985, which granted the defendant wife’s application for an award of counsel fees.

Order reversed, on the facts and as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and application denied.

Counsel fees were awarded to the defendant in connection with her successful motion to vacate an uncontested judgment of divorce which had been granted to the plaintiff on January 30, 1984.

A judgment of divorce was granted to the plaintiff on January 30, 1984, on the ground that the parties had been living separate and apart pursuant to a written separation agreement and a subsequent amendment thereto. The defendant thereafter sought to vacate the judgment of divorce on the grounds that the plaintiff was guilty of duress and deceit in procuring her consent to the separation agreement.

Although the court, after a hearing, vacated the judgment of divorce, it did not do so based on the defendant’s allegations; indeed, it specifically rejected those allegations. Rather, the court vacated the judgment of divorce because it was based on “outright perjury when it is obvious the parties lived together after the separation agreement was signed”.

In view of the defendant’s collusion in the fraud perpetrated on the court, we are of the view that this case is not an [646]*646instance where "justice requires” an award of counsel fees (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Niehoff and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chamberlain v. Chamberlain
24 A.D.3d 589 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 A.D.2d 645, 501 N.Y.S.2d 88, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyn-v-meyn-nyappdiv-1986.