Meyerson v. Reifler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meyerson v. Reifler

39 A.D.2d 776, 333 N.Y.S.2d 376, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4460

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 30, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 39 A.D.2d 776 (Meyerson v. Reifler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyerson v. Reifler, 39 A.D.2d 776, 333 N.Y.S.2d 376, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4460 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, defendants Reifler appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 8, 1971, as denied their motion to vacate a default judgment entered against them. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs, and motion granted, on conditions that within 10 days after entry of the order to be made hereon (1) defendants Reifler give an undertaking, with corporate surety, in the amount of $60,000, in terms that they will pay any judgment for money that may be entered against them in this action and (2) their attorneys personally pay plaintiff $250 as costs; and, in the event said conditions not be complied with, the order is affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, the motion should have been granted, upon the conditions imposed herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, defendants Reifler appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 8, 1971, as denied their motion to vacate a default judgment entered against them. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs, and motion granted, on conditions that within 10 days after entry of the order to be made hereon (1) defendants Reifler give an undertaking, with corporate surety, in the amount of $60,000, in terms that they will pay any judgment for money that may be entered against them in this action and (2) their attorneys personally pay plaintiff $250 as costs; and, in the event said conditions not be complied with, the order is affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, the motion should have been granted, upon the conditions imposed herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.2d 776, 333 N.Y.S.2d 376, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyerson-v-reifler-nyappdiv-1972.