Meyers v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meyers v. Young

270 A.D. 800, 60 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3978

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 18, 1946

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 270 A.D. 800 (Meyers v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyers v. Young, 270 A.D. 800, 60 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3978 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and facts and as a matter of discretion, with $10 costs and disbursements, and actions oi’dered to be tried together. (See Civ. Prae. Act, § 96-a; Crandall v. Leach é Co., Inc., 222 App. Div. 292; McAllister V. Drislane, 239 App. Div. 85; Olson v. Abbott, 267 App. Div. 1044.) All concur. (The order denies a motion of defendants Womeldorf and Young to consolidate two actions.) Present— Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, MeCurn and Larkin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law and facts and as a matter of discretion, with $10 costs and disbursements, and actions oi’dered to be tried together. (See Civ. Prae. Act, § 96-a; Crandall v. Leach é Co., Inc., 222 App. Div. 292; McAllister V. Drislane, 239 App. Div. 85; Olson v. Abbott, 267 App. Div. 1044.) All concur. (The order denies a motion of defendants Womeldorf and Young to consolidate two actions.) Present— Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, MeCurn and Larkin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 A.D. 800, 60 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyers-v-young-nyappdiv-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack