Meyers v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meyers v. Young

270 A.D. 800, 60 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3978

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 18, 1946·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and facts and as a matter of discretion, with $10 costs and disbursements, and actions oi’dered to be tried together. (See Civ. Prae. Act, § 96-a; Crandall v. Leach é Co., Inc., 222 App. Div. 292; McAllister V. Drislane, 239 App. Div. 85; Olson v. Abbott, 267 App. Div. 1044.) All concur. (The order denies a motion of defendants Womeldorf and Young to consolidate two actions.) Present— Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, MeCurn and Larkin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law and facts and as a matter of discretion, with $10 costs and disbursements, and actions oi’dered to be tried together. (See Civ. Prae. Act, § 96-a; Crandall v. Leach é Co., Inc., 222 App. Div. 292; McAllister V. Drislane, 239 App. Div. 85; Olson v. Abbott, 267 App. Div. 1044.) All concur. (The order denies a motion of defendants Womeldorf and Young to consolidate two actions.) Present— Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, MeCurn and Larkin, JJ.

Meyers v. Young, 270 A.D. 800, 60 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3978 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

270 A.D. 800 (Meyers v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related