Home/Supreme Court/Meyers v. Whittle

Meyers v. Whittle

283 U.S. 795, 51 S. Ct. 489, 75 L. Ed. 1419, 1931 U.S. LEXIS 201
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 20, 1931
DocketNo. 838
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 283 U.S. 795 (Meyers v. Whittle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meyers v. Whittle, 283 U.S. 795, 51 S. Ct. 489, 75 L. Ed. 1419, 1931 U.S. LEXIS 201 (1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied. The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Malloy v. South Carolina, 237 U. S. 180, 183, 185; Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U.S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 [796]*796U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.

Mr. Benjamin E. Pierce for appellant. Messrs. George M. Napier and T. R. Gress for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of the Magnavox Company and Sanders Associates, Inc. Appeal of Universal Research Laboratories, Inc., Debtor
627 F.2d 803 (Seventh Circuit, 1980)
Lackner v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.
111 F.2d 136 (Seventh Circuit, 1940)
Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Slattery
102 F.2d 58 (Seventh Circuit, 1939)
Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Wallace
75 P.2d 942 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 U.S. 795, 51 S. Ct. 489, 75 L. Ed. 1419, 1931 U.S. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyers-v-whittle-scotus-1931.