Meyers v. U. S. Health & Accdt. Ins.

Hamilton Circuit Court

Meyers v. U. S. Health & Accdt. Ins.

20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 807, 11 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 432

Hamilton Circuit Court·Decided December 21, 1907·Published

Opinion

GIFFEN, J.

An undertaking for appeal from a judgment of a justice of .the peace, when approved by a justice of the same township, with the trial justice and at his request, shows a substantial compliance with the provisions of Sec. 6584 Rev. Stat., that the surety “be approved by such justice,” and confers jurisdiction. Job v. Harlan, 13 Ohio St. 485.

Judgment affirmed.

Swing and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GIFFEN, J.

An undertaking for appeal from a judgment of a justice of .the peace, when approved by a justice of the same township, with the trial justice and at his request, shows a substantial compliance with the provisions of Sec. 6584 Rev. Stat., that the surety “be approved by such justice,” and confers jurisdiction. Job v. Harlan, 13 Ohio St. 485.

Judgment affirmed.

Swing and Smith, JJ., concur.

Meyers v. U. S. Health & Accdt. Ins., 20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 807, 11 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 432 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1907).

Pincite

20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 807 (Meyers v. U. S. Health & Accdt. Ins.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related