Meyers v. State
8 S.W.2d 125, 110 Tex. Crim. 212, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 525
Opinions
The offense is embezzlement, a felony; the punishment confinement in the penitentiary for five years.
The recognizance is defective. It is not shown therein that appellant has been convicted of a felony. See Meyers v. State, No. 11,284, this day decided.
The appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meyers v. State, 8 S.W.2d 125, 110 Tex. Crim. 212, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 525 (Tex. 1928).
8 S.W.2d 125 (Meyers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
New v. State
74 S.W.2d 697 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Scisson v. State
51 S.W.2d 703 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)