Meyers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Meyers v. State

464 So. 2d 189, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 363, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14129

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 8, 1985·No. No. 83-2407·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find error only in the trial court’s retention of jurisdiction over one-half of appellant’s sentence. In accordance with this court’s opinion in Hayes v. State, 448 So.2d 84 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), on motion to modify mandate, 452 So.2d 656 (1984), we remand this case to the trial court for correction of the sentence to reflect the trial court’s retention of jurisdiction over only one-third of the sentence.

Appellant’s judgment and sentence is otherwise AFFIRMED.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and DANAHY, J., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find error only in the trial court’s retention of jurisdiction over one-half of appellant’s sentence. In accordance with this court’s opinion in Hayes v. State, 448 So.2d 84 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), on motion to modify mandate, 452 So.2d 656 (1984), we remand this case to the trial court for correction of the sentence to reflect the trial court’s retention of jurisdiction over only one-third of the sentence.

Appellant’s judgment and sentence is otherwise AFFIRMED.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and DANAHY, J., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) J., concur.

Meyers v. State, 464 So. 2d 189, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 363, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14129 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

464 So. 2d 189 (Meyers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related