Meyers v. Saltry

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Meyers v. Saltry

175 S.W. 626, 164 Ky. 350, 1915 Ky. LEXIS 370

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky

DecidedApril 27, 1915

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 175 S.W. 626 (Meyers v. Saltry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyers v. Saltry, 175 S.W. 626, 164 Ky. 350, 1915 Ky. LEXIS 370 (Ky. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Denying motion to file record.

The opinion in this case was handed down March 11, 1915, and may he found in 163 Ky., 481. We are asked, in a petition for a rehearing, accompanied by motion and affidavits, to set aside the submission of the case, withdraw the opinion, and permit a record to be filed that was not a part of the record when the case was disposed of.

The exceptional circumstances attending thii; motion strongly persuade us to grant it, but in view of the uniform ruling of this court in refusing similar requests it must be denied. Christopher v. Searcy, 12 Bush, 171, Yeager v. Groves, 78 Ky., 278; Martin v. Royse, 21 Ky, L. R., 1353; McGerty v. McGerty, 21 Ky. L. R., 1366; Leonard v. Cowling, 121 Ky., 631; Louisville Bridge Co. v. Neafus, 110 Ky., 571.

A different rule prevails when a motion is made by appellee to file an additional record after an opinion has been handed down and before the petition for a rehearing has been disposed of. Chesapeake & Ohio R. Co. v. Kelly, 161 Ky., 660; Miller Creek R. R. Co. v. Barnett, 160 Ky., 845.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI