Meyers v. Piroscafo

382 A.2d 1329, 174 Conn. 798
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 7, 1978
StatusPublished

This text of 382 A.2d 1329 (Meyers v. Piroscafo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meyers v. Piroscafo, 382 A.2d 1329, 174 Conn. 798 (Colo. 1978).

Opinion

It appearing that the plaintiff in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book ^ 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
382 A.2d 1329, 174 Conn. 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyers-v-piroscafo-conn-1978.