Meyers v. Hoops

162 N.E.2d 154, 81 Ohio Law. Abs. 352, 1954 Ohio App. LEXIS 783
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Meyers v. Hoops. Read the opinion of the Court — 74 Ohio Law. Abs. 280
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided November 18, 1954·No. No. 2311·Published

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT:

Submitted on motion of plaintiffs-appellants to dismiss the cross appeal filed by defendant.

In the court below, plaintiffs sued for breach of contract, and the defendant filed a cross-petition asking for rescission. The trial court dismissed both the petition and the cross-petition. Plaintiffs appealed on law and fact. Subsequently the defendant appealed on law and fact. Plaintiffs contend that defendant’s appeal is from only that part of the judgment denying rescission, and that a partial appeal may not be taken. The notice of appeal filed by defendant is “from the judgment of the Common Pleas Court entered on the 19th day of October, 1954, dismissing the answer and cross-petition of defendant.” As we view it, the appeal filed by defendant is from the judgment, and cannot be construed as a partial appeal. The defendant has expressed a willingness to strike the words: “dismissing the answer and cross-petition of defendant,” and leave is granted defendant to amend such notice by striking these words.

Motion to dismiss the cross-appeal is overruled.

WISEMAN, PJ, MILLER and HORNBECK, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meyers v. Hoops, 162 N.E.2d 154, 81 Ohio Law. Abs. 352, 1954 Ohio App. LEXIS 783 (Ohio Ct. App. 1954).

162 N.E.2d 154 (Meyers v. Hoops) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.