Meyers v. Grand Union Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meyers v. Grand Union Co.

26 A.D.2d 646, 272 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3697

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 5, 1966·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of falling in a. supermarket, defendant Grand Union Company appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered July 7, 1964, on the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff. Judgment reversed on the law, the facts and in the interests of justice, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. In our opinion, the charge was inadequate. It was brief, general, and contained only broad statements of legal principles, without any mention of the facts. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of falling in a. supermarket, defendant Grand Union Company appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered July 7, 1964, on the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff. Judgment reversed on the law, the facts and in the interests of justice, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. In our opinion, the charge was inadequate. It was brief, general, and contained only broad statements of legal principles, without any mention of the facts. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Meyers v. Grand Union Co., 26 A.D.2d 646, 272 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

26 A.D.2d 646 (Meyers v. Grand Union Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related