Meyers v. Freud

33 Misc. 806, 67 N.Y.S. 1140
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1901
StatusPublished

This text of 33 Misc. 806 (Meyers v. Freud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meyers v. Freud, 33 Misc. 806, 67 N.Y.S. 1140 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1901).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment must be affirmed; it clearly appears that the plaintiff’s assignor was justified in terminating the [807]*807■contract made between her and the defendant, because the latter not only failed to pay the sum of money which the defendant admitted was owing thereunder, but refused to do so until she was ■ready and willing. Under these circumstances, the election made ¡to end the contract, and the removal of the goods owned by the plaintiff’s assignor from the defendant’s premises, were just and reasonable acts.

Judgment affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Present: Fitzsimons, Oh. J., and Has call, J.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Misc. 806, 67 N.Y.S. 1140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyers-v-freud-nynyccityct-1901.