Meyers v. Department of Human Resources

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Meyers v. Department of Human Resources

422 S.E.2d 576, 332 N.C. 655, 1992 N.C. LEXIS 580

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 19, 1992

DocketNo. 119A92

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 422 S.E.2d 576 (Meyers v. Department of Human Resources) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyers v. Department of Human Resources, 422 S.E.2d 576, 332 N.C. 655, 1992 N.C. LEXIS 580 (N.C. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the opinion by Lewis, J., the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

On 24 June 1992, this Court allowed the petition of the defendant-appellant, State Personnel Commission, for discretionary review of the additional issue as to whether the Personnel Commission is a necessary party. We now determine that discretionary review of that issue was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the opinion by Lewis, J., the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

On 24 June 1992, this Court allowed the petition of the defendant-appellant, State Personnel Commission, for discretionary review of the additional issue as to whether the Personnel Commission is a necessary party. We now determine that discretionary review of that issue was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

422 S.E.2d 576, 332 N.C. 655, 1992 N.C. LEXIS 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyers-v-department-of-human-resources-nc-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack