Meyers v. Coleman

192 N.W. 184, 46 S.D. 244, 1923 S.D. LEXIS 13
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 20, 1923
DocketFile No. 5148
StatusPublished

This text of 192 N.W. 184 (Meyers v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meyers v. Coleman, 192 N.W. 184, 46 S.D. 244, 1923 S.D. LEXIS 13 (S.D. 1923).

Opinion

DILLON, J.

The sole question before this court: Was the claim for exemption on the part of the wife made within a reasonable time?

[1, 2] The husband having failed to assert the right, the wife was entitled to make such, claim. She made it within 22 days from the date of the levy. We hold that the claim was made within a reasonable time.

On the authority of Goodland v. Smejkal (S. D.), 190 N. W. 1017, this cause is reversed, with directions that the peremptory writ of mandamus be issuied, requiring the sheriff to restore to the relator the property claimed as exempt.

Note — Reported in 192 N. W. 184. See American Key-Numbered Digest, (1) Exemptions, Key-No. 118, 25 'C. J. Sec. 23'2; 11 R. C. L. 547; (2) Exemptions, Key-No. 119(1), 25 C. J. Secs. 235-240.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goodlad v. Smejkal
190 N.W. 1017 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1922)
Pennington County v. Red Lake Drainage & Conservancy District
192 N.W. 184 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 N.W. 184, 46 S.D. 244, 1923 S.D. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyers-v-coleman-sd-1923.