Meyers v. Coleman

192 N.W. 184, 46 S.D. 244, 1923 S.D. LEXIS 13
South Dakota Supreme Court·Decided February 20, 1923·No. File No. 5148·Published

Opinion

DILLON, J.

The sole question before this court: Was the claim for exemption on the part of the wife made within a reasonable time?

[1, 2] The husband having failed to assert the right, the wife was entitled to make such, claim. She made it within 22 days from the date of the levy. We hold that the claim was made within a reasonable time.

On the authority of Goodland v. Smejkal (S. D.), 190 N. W. 1017, this cause is reversed, with directions that the peremptory writ of mandamus be issuied, requiring the sheriff to restore to the relator the property claimed as exempt.

Note — Reported in 192 N. W. 184. See American Key-Numbered Digest, (1) Exemptions, Key-No. 118, 25 'C. J. Sec. 23'2; 11 R. C. L. 547; (2) Exemptions, Key-No. 119(1), 25 C. J. Secs. 235-240.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meyers v. Coleman, 192 N.W. 184, 46 S.D. 244, 1923 S.D. LEXIS 13 (S.D. 1923).

192 N.W. 184 (Meyers v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goodlad v. Smejkal
190 N.W. 1017 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1922)
Pennington County v. Red Lake Drainage & Conservancy District
192 N.W. 184 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1923)