Meyers v. Cincinnati Board Of Education

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio
DecidedJanuary 31, 2020
Docket1:17-cv-00521
StatusUnknown

This text of Meyers v. Cincinnati Board Of Education (Meyers v. Cincinnati Board Of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meyers v. Cincinnati Board Of Education, (S.D. Ohio 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Karen Meyers as Administratrix of the : Case No. 1:17-cv-521 Estate of Gabriel Taye, et al, : : Judge: Timothy S. Black Plaintiffs, : v. : : Cincinnati Board of Education et al., : : Defendants. :

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR THE PROTECTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION

Undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective parties, move the Court to enter into the following protective order (“Order”). The Court recognizes that discovery activity in this case will require the disclosure of autopsy records, medical and mental health records, student records, and other sensitive personal information of parties and non-parties, including minors and students. Under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and federal law protecting such information, good cause exists to protect this information from public disclosure. In the absence of a suitable protective order safeguarding the confidentiality of such information, the parties would be hampered in their ability to obtain and produce such information. Accordingly, the parties stipulate and the Court ORDERS that the parties shall be bound by the following restrictions of this Order: INFORMATION SUBJECT TO THIS ORDER 1. This Order shall govern all documents (including all “documents” as defined in Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)) and other products of discovery obtained by the parties from one another, and from non-parties, all information copied or derived therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries or compilations thereof, including documents produced pursuant to requests authorized by the requests for admission, affidavits, declarations, expert reports, and other such material and information as may be produced during the course of this litigation. 2a. Any party or non-party that produces information as to which it then has a reasonable good faith basis in law and fact to believe is autopsy records, medical records, mental health records, student records, or other sensitive personal information of parties and non-parties, including minors and students, at the time of production, shall designate such information “CONFIDENTIAL.” Information designated “CONFIDENTIAL” is “Confidential Information” and shall thereafter be subject to the provisions of this Order. 2b. Information that is properly in the public domain at the time of disclosure,

independently developed by the receiving party, or that is in the possession of or becomes available to the receiving party other than through discovery in this action is not Confidential Information subject to this Protective Order. 3. Confidential Information shall be so designated by stamping “CONFIDENTIAL” on each page. If the Confidential Information cannot be so labeled, it must be designated “CONFIDENTIAL” in some other conspicuous manner (e.g., by placing a “CONFIDENTIAL” label on the outside of any electronic device containing Confidential information). 4. Parties may designate as confidential any deposition testimony regarding documents

identified as Confidential Information when referenced in any deposition by making such designation on the record at the time of the deposition. If no Confidential Information designation is made during a deposition, the contents shall be treated as confidential under this Order until 15 days after receipt of the deposition transcript. Within that time period, any party wishing to designate all or any portion of the deposition transcript as confidential shall make the appropriate designation in writing and shall then serve that designation by electronic or U.S. mail upon counsel deposition or within 5 business days of the deposition, the contents of the deposition in its entirety shall be treated as confidential up to and until a copy of the transcript is ordered. 5. In the event of an inadvertent disclosure of Confidential Information without proper designation, the disclosing party shall inform the other party of the error. Inadvertent failure to designate any information pursuant to this Order shall not constitute a waiver of an otherwise valid claim for protection, so long as such claim is asserted within 30 days after the discovery of the inadvertent disclosure. Following discovery of the inadvertent disclosure, the disclosing party shall provide within 3 business days a properly designated set of such Confidential Information to the other party, whom shall destroy copies of the improperly designated documents and certify such

destruction to the disclosing party. Nothing in this Protective Order is intended to, or shall be deemed to, alter the operation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 or Fed. R. Evid. 502 regarding inadvertent disclosure of information subject to a valid privilege or protection in this litigation. 6. Confidential Information protected by this Order may be disclosed only to the following: a. Counsel of record; b. Members of the legal, paralegal, secretarial, and clerical staff of such counsel; c. The Court and its personnel; d. Expert consultants or witnesses retained by any party; e. Parties, i. For the Cincinnati Board of Education, this only includes the Board

members, the Superintendent, and legal counsel; and ii. For Defendant Margaret McLaughlin, this only includes Margaret McLaughlin, the Cincinnati Health Commissioner, the Chair of the Board of Health and legal counsel; deposition;

g. Court reporters and videographers and their personnel engaged in proceedings incident to preparation for trial or engaged in trial; h. Defendants’ insurers, claim adjusters, and personnel; i. Professional vendors and their employees, including copy services, e- discovery services, trial graphics services, and translation services, engaged by counsel. 7. Prior to receiving any Confidential Information, any person described in Paragraph 6(d)- (i) shall be furnished with a copy of this Order and execute the Agreement attached as Exhibit A. The signed Agreement shall be maintained by counsel until the conclusion of this action. 8. While protected by this Order, any Confidential Information shall be held in confidence by each person to whom it is disclosed. 9. Any document subject to this Order that is used at trial, in discovery, in a deposition, expert report, pleading, or in any other way so as to make it a potentially public record, shall be

submitted “under seal” with prior permission of the Court, upon motion and for good cause shown. This Order does not authorize filing protected Confidential Information under seal. No document may be filed with the Court under seal without prior permission as to each such filing, upon motion and for good cause shown, including the legal basis for filing under seal. See Procter & Gamble Co. v. Bankers Trust Co., 78 F.3d 219 (6th Cir. 1996). 10. Within 30 days following a final determination of this litigation, every person or party to whom Confidential Information has been furnished or produced shall destroy all copies to the extent permitted by law, and provide the producing party with counsel’s certification of that destruction. This paragraph includes deposition exhibits, but not attorney notes. This paragraph does not require any party to return or destroy any information which was filed with the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Meyers v. Cincinnati Board Of Education, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyers-v-cincinnati-board-of-education-ohsd-2020.