Meyers v. Berl
Opinion
| Meyers v Berl |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 00561 |
| Decided on February 3, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on February 3, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, BANNISTER, AND MONTOUR, JJ.
845 CA 22-00424
v
BRIAN T. BERL AND FAITH BERL, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
UNDERBERG & KESSLER LLP, BUFFALO (THOMAS F. KNAB OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
KENDALL, WALTON & BURROWS, WATERTOWN (KATHRYN J. HARRIENGER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from a judgment and order (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (James P. McClusky, J.), entered August 25, 2021. The judgment and order, inter alia, declared that plaintiffs have an easement over defendants' property.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Matter of Laborers Intl. Union of N. Am., Local 210, AFL-CIO v Shevlin-Manning, Inc., 147 AD2d 977, 977 [4th Dept 1989]).
Entered: February 3, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2023 NY Slip Op 00561 (Meyers v. Berl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.