Meyers v. 650 Madison Avenue Corp.

259 A.D. 109, 18 N.Y.S.2d 256, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6059
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 259 A.D. 109 (Meyers v. 650 Madison Avenue Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meyers v. 650 Madison Avenue Corp., 259 A.D. 109, 18 N.Y.S.2d 256, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6059 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

There was sufficient evidence to sustain the finding by the jury that the plaintiff had procured a lessee ready, able and willing to enter into a lease of the premises on the terms proposed by the defendant. It was also error to exclude evidence offered by the plaintiff concerning parol negotiations with the prospective lessee which was competent to establish the services rendered by the plaintiff. We have concluded, however, to order a new trial rather than to reinstate the verdict for the reason that the authority of the defendant’s secretary to conclude a transaction of such magnitude does not clearly appear from the present record.

The judgment and the order should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present — O’Malley, TowNley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pomerantz v. Sussman
279 A.D. 1019 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D. 109, 18 N.Y.S.2d 256, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyers-v-650-madison-avenue-corp-nyappdiv-1940.