Meyerowitz v. Horowitz

New York Supreme Court

Meyerowitz v. Horowitz

129 Misc. 215, 220 N.Y.S. 681, 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 871

DecidedMarch 23, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 129 Misc. 215 (Meyerowitz v. Horowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyerowitz v. Horowitz, 129 Misc. 215, 220 N.Y.S. 681, 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 871 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trial court erred in refusing to charge, at plaintiff’s request, “ that if the subtenant Brown remained in the premises after the lease had expired, without the permission of the landlord Meyerowitz, then the tenants Horowitz and Joseph, may be held by the landlord as holdovers.”

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to the appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Crain, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The trial court erred in refusing to charge, at plaintiff’s request, “ that if the subtenant Brown remained in the premises after the lease had expired, without the permission of the landlord Meyerowitz, then the tenants Horowitz and Joseph, may be held by the landlord as holdovers.”

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to the appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Crain, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 Misc. 215, 220 N.Y.S. 681, 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyerowitz-v-horowitz-nysupct-1927.