Meyerland Co. v. Continental Savings Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Texas

Meyerland Co. v. Continental Savings Ass'n

848 S.W.2d 165, 1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 1921

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 16, 1992·No. No. 01-87-00730-CV·Published

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The Court today considered the “Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Want of Jurisdiction and Reurgence of Motion for Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel” of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Continental Savings Association. The motion to dismiss appeal for want of jurisdiction is hereby granted. The motion for withdrawal and substitution of counsel has been granted in a separate order.

It is so ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The Court today considered the “Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Want of Jurisdiction and Reurgence of Motion for Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel” of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Continental Savings Association. The motion to dismiss appeal for want of jurisdiction is hereby granted. The motion for withdrawal and substitution of counsel has been granted in a separate order.

It is so ORDERED.

Meyerland Co. v. Continental Savings Ass'n, 848 S.W.2d 165, 1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 1921 (Tex. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

848 S.W.2d 165 (Meyerland Co. v. Continental Savings Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.